By Baron Ike
Contrary to claims by the Shiite leader, Ibraheem El-Zakzaky that India was not prepared to host him and the wife and offer them medical treatment, and that the federal government was instrumental to the frustration they met in India, the federal government said the reverse is the case.
El-Zakzaky and the wife, Zenaat, left Nigeria for India on Sunday August 13 escorted by some Nigerian security operatives based on the ruling of the Kaduna state high court for medical treatment, but on Thursday, August 15 they announced their intention to return back to Nigeria.
They did on Friday, August 16 and were immediately taken into custody by the Department of State Security Services (DSS) in Abuja.
Few hours after their arrival in Nigeria, the federal government issued a statement signed by the permanent secretary in the ministry of information, Grace Isu Gekpe to explain the circumstances surrounding their sudden return from India.
Tagged: The repatriation of Ibaheem El-Zakzaky from India – Gekpe wrote:
“The Federal Government wishes to inform the public about the latest development in the Ibraheem El-Zakzaky medical trip controversies to India.
“The Government notes with dismay the acts of misconduct exhibited by El-Zakzaky that necessitated his repatriation.
“The earlier statement of 14th August 2019 by the Government addressed the issues that would have raised some questions with the latest occurrences and particularly the uncelebrated return of El-Zakzaky from India.
“The public may note that El-Zakzaky’s actions in India demonstrated malicious intents that were capable of embarrassing the Governments of Nigeria and India.
“With total disrespect and complete loss of decorum for international procedures while in India, he initiated contacts with a team of lawyers led by Ali Zia Kabir Chaudary and Gunjan Singh in that country. He also contacted some Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), such as the Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC) and other Shiite groups. His aim was to seek asylum and eventually relocate to another country.
“It is important to note that if an Indian court had granted El-Zakzaky asylum or leave to travel to another country, it would have violated the Nigerian court order that granted him permission to travel for medical treatment.
“However, he used the opportunity of being in India to attempt to internationalise his cause by mobilising the Rights groups. Even most unfortunate and rather embarrassing as earlier stated, was his quest to be relocated to a 5-Star hotel to receive visitors instead of being admitted in the hospital as a sick person he claimed to be.
“In spite of his misconduct, El-Zakzaky’s spouse went further to antagonize the Indian and Nigerian security agents and accused the latter of killing her children.
“These acts were aimed at winning international sympathy as well as disparaging the Nigerian Government. Having subordinated the quest for medical treatment to other ulterior motives, it became obvious that El-Zakzaky was focused on realising some sinister motives thus the decision to return him to Nigeria.”