They dismissed the allegations of fraud, dishonesty and divulging official secret and classified documents levelled against the affected directors as untrue, insisting they were concocted lies by the authorities to achieve their selfish goals.
“We even read in the dailies that since the offices occupied by the retired directors have now been occupied by others who have moved up the ladder, recalling them could cause crisis in the system. Again this is false.This is not the first time workers or even political appointees that were wrongfully retired are called back. Even in the police and military settings, officers retired based on allegations of wrong doings are often recalled when they were cleared. What this resistance being put by the DPR means is that the powers that be retired those directors prematurely and quickly used their loyalists as replacement. This illegality does not augur well for the oil industry and should be reversed forthwith”, said a top oil industry expert, who craved anonymity.
The Head of Service (HoS), after thorough investigation, was said to have found the directors innocent of all the allegations, prompting the recommendation for their recall.
But rather than obey the directive, the DPR was said to have embarked on media campaign against the affected directors and the Head of Service all in a desperate bid to stop their reinstatement.
The DPR has in recent times become synonymous with setting contradictory targets on oil and gas projects, a development which stakeholders view as embarrassing to operators in the sector.
Experts in the oil sector, who blamed poor regulatory oversight as the major challenge in the industry, have commended the provision of two regulatory agencies for the oil sector, describing it as a turning point for the Petroleum Industry.